Worth Reading: 13 Ways of Looking at the Novel
January 7, 2008 at 8:20 am | In Books, Reviews | 4 CommentsTags: Authorship, Biography, Fiction history, Jane Smiley, Literary criticism
13 Ways of Looking at the Novel, Jane Smiley (2005)
5 stars!
This book is a must-read for anyone who loves reading novels as well as for new and experienced writers. Although it covers its subject in great depth and detail, analyzing the novel throughout its history by closely examining 100 (actually, slightly more) representatives of the form, it is such fascinating material and such food for thought that it doesn’t seem academic at all. In fact, a lot of witticisms are scattered throughout (such as, “the biographer is the author’s natural enemy”), as well as useful, practical and compassionate advice for those who aspire to write a novel themselves.
I won’t say that I agree with every theory Smiley posits. She pretty much omits genre fiction, and she takes a highly feminized viewpoint, which I think betrays her reading tastes. Her outlook of the novel as a form that has primarily dealt with the question of what to do about women is likely a result of her bias toward books that focus on female characters and women’s issues; she pretty much dismisses masculine-themed books such as Moby Dick and Heart of Darkness (two personal favorites).
Smiley’s most valuable offering is a short and precise definition of what a novel is that can’t really be argued with: A novel is a lengthy, written, prose narrative with a protagonist. From that starting point, all of her subsequent ideas of what the novel is flow. This is a juicy book, one which I found inspirational both for my reading life and my writing aspirations.
4 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI
Leave a comment
Categories
Authors and Genres
Alternate history Audrey Niffenegger Banned books Barbara Kingsolver Books about books Children's literature Chris Adrian Classic Contemporary fiction Cormac McCarthy David Brin David Mitchell Dystopia E-book Environmentalism Fantasy Food and cooking Historical fiction Horror Hugo award Jane Smiley Joe Hill Jonathan Lethem Kazuo Ishiguro Kim Stanley Robinson Kurt Vonnegut Mainstream Margaret Atwood Michael Chabon Nebula award Neil Gaiman Nonfiction Octavia Butler Philosophy Post-apocalypse Science fiction Series Short stories Speculative fiction Spiritual sci fi Stephen King Stewart O'Nan Thriller Time travel Ursula K Le GuinArchives
-
Favorites
Latest Tweet
- How to protect your children from vampire bites and other safety advice http://ff.im/-55HF6 5 hours ago
What I’m Reading
What Should I Read Next?
Reading Lists-
Good Reads
Blogroll
- A Guy’s Moleskine Notebook
- A Novel Menagerie
- A Striped Armchair
- A Traveler’s Library
- Age 30+…A Lifetime of Books
- At Home with Books
- Average Girl Reads
- Beautiful Desolation
- Biblibio
- Bloody Hell, It’s a Book Barrage
- Book Addiction
- Book Critiques
- BookBabie
- Booknaround
- Delayed Again
- Devourer of Books
- Don’t Talk About Book Club
- Donura Reads
- Dream Casting
- Drey’s Library
- From a Sci-Fi Standpoint
- Judge a Book By Its Cover
- Life After Work
- Maw Books Blog
- Millard Filmore’s Bathtub
- MnDialog
- ReaderBuzz
- Rhapsody in Books
- Ruined My Life
- Sam’s Book Blog
- SF Signal
- The Biblio Brat
- The Book Lady’s Blog
- The World in the Satin Bag
- Things Mean a Lot
- Tripping Toward Lucidity
- Tuesday in Silhouette
- Unmainstream Mom Reads
- Words All Day Thru
- Zawan's Blog
Entertaining
Essential Reads
My Other Blogs
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.




I like Ms. Smiley, she’s a literate author, but this notion of dismissing male-themed books is ridiculous in the extreme. Truly GREAT books are GREAT regardless of the gender of the protagonist or the theme. Any serious discussion of the novel that employs gender considerations is not a serious literary discussion, it more likely belongs in one of those silly “gender studies” programs that have proliferated like lice.
Comment by Cliff Burns — January 7, 2008 #
Hi, Cliff: Thanks for the response. Have you read the book? While I agree that Smiley may be a bit biased in terms of gender, I think there are a lot of great ideas in her book that go beyond gender, which is why I think it is worth reading. I wouldn’t say that she dismisses male-themed books outright but rather that she displays a bias in her reading tastes that she may not be fully aware of. But I certainly agree with your second statement, which is why I try to read as broadly as I can while still enjoying what I’m reading. Thanks for visiting!
Comment by Shannon — January 7, 2008 #
I was surprised by how much I enjoyed “13 Ways of Looking At The Novel.” I found it very practical and well-written. The Humor Genre gets minimized, as does all genre fiction (as you’ve pointed out above). However, this book does contain a lot of information useful to a working writer.
Comment by agpasquella — January 7, 2008 #
[...] — unless it’s written particularly well, such as in Jane Smiley’s entertaining 13 Ways of Looking at the Novel. I also don’t like to write that kind of criticism. I’m not in school [...]
Pingback by How do you use book reviews? « Books Worth Reading — August 29, 2008 #