Old Favorite: Cloud Atlas
May 20, 2009 at 3:42 pm | In Books, Reviews | 2 CommentsTags: David Mitchell, Dialects, Dystopia, Post-apocalypse
Cloud Atlas by David Mitchell (2004)
5 stars!
An intricate series of somewhat connected stories that begins on a 17th-century ship and culminates in a post-apocalyptic Hawaii, Cloud Atlas is a precisely crafted and challenging novel. Each story ends abruptly, wrenching into the next, moving forward in time like progressive notes on a scale, and then descending back to the beginning.
During the upward run, it’s difficult to grasp the connections between, say, the South Pacific schooner and a composer’s mansion in 1920s Germany, or between 1970s California and a near-future Japan where our clones are our servants. Although the physical connections are apparent — one character in each story experiences in some way the story that came before, such as through discovering and reading a lost manuscript or watching a computer-projected hologram. And it’s implied that one character in each story is the reincarnated version of someone who came before. But the theme that connects all the stories — of apocalypse and annihilation of the “other” — does not become clear until the reader is descending backward in time.
Related articles by Zemanta
- Hell Is Repetition: The Theme of Cycles in Science Fiction (readmorebooks.wordpress.com)
- “Cloud Atlas” to be made into film. (condalmo.wordpress.com)
Hell Is Repetition: The Theme of Cycles in Science Fiction
May 14, 2009 at 11:03 am | In Books | 2 CommentsTags: David Mitchell, Eternal return, Jerry Pournelle, Ken Grimwood, Larry Niven, Science fiction, Stephen King
Recently, I have become fascinated with the notion of cycles. We humans tend to regard everything linearly, with a beginning and an end, because that is our individual experience. But taking a wider view, we can see that events tend to happen in cycles, that an end leads inexorably to another beginning. It’s easiest to see this in nature, with our regular seasonal cycles and the cycle of growth to death to fertilizer to new life again. In physics, the concept of eternal return posits that the universe has been recurring and will continue to recur in a self-similar form an infinite number of times. According to Eastern religions, we are all caught up in the Wheel of Life, an endless cycle of birth, death and rebirth, until we can escape via enlightenment.
Post-apocalyptic literature, a favorite of mine, is obsessed with endings, an interesting mind game in itself. What would happen if everything, as we know it, just stopped? But the concept of repeating patterns, of endless cycles, is even more of a mind bender. Recently, a couple of favorite TV shows have explored this theme.
**Spoilers for Battlestar Galactica and Lost follow, so stop reading now if you don’t want to know.**
Battlestar Galactica’s controversial finale, seen as a happy ending by some and as a silly warning to be nice to your robots by others, was, in my view, highly pessimistic. Despite all their efforts to break the cycle of Cylon uprising and mutual destruction, even to the point of sacrificing their technological advantages, the surviving characters only managed to put the inevitable off for a few thousand years. But all this has happened before, and will happen again — and the cycle begins anew on modern-day Earth.
Lost is exploring similar themes, although it is not clear yet whether the pattern can actually be broken. Still, last night’s excellent season finale asks the question: If the pattern is destined to keep repeating, why take action at all? Why not just opt out? In my opinion, the show has not taken a side. We’ve seen characters opt out (Bernard and Rose), and they seem perfectly happy. We’ve seen other characters take action to try to change the pattern, break the cycle, but we don’t know if they will be successful. Even if they are unable to change the pattern, will just trying be enough for some kind of personal salvation or redemption? Is what matters making a choice and doing something, rather than the effects of that action? These are great questions to ponder on a sleepless night.
I am now getting interested in science fiction novels that explore similar themes. Here are a few that I could think of (ahoy, there may be spoilers ahead):
- Cloud Atlas by David Mitchell, which is structured in a cyclical manner progressing forward and then back through time.
- The Dark Tower series by Stephen King, in which Roland seems doomed to relive the events of his quest for the Dark Tower until he can find a way to break the cycle of repetition.
- The Mote in God’s Eye by Larry Niven and Jerry Pournelle, in which an alien civilization is doomed to cause its own apocalypse and then rise from the ashes over and over.
- Replay by Ken Grimwood, in which a man relives his life again and again (I haven’t read this).
Does anyone have other suggestions? I would love to hear them.
Book News and Views
February 6, 2009 at 4:39 pm | In Books, On the Web | Leave a CommentTags: David Mitchell
Collected from around the Interwebs for your reading (and viewing) pleasure:
- When you read, you do make a movie in your mind — this study proves it.
- The past, present and future of e-books (and why the term e-book is all wrong).
- I don’t know how they’ll do it, but they are trying to turn one of my favorite novels, Cloud Atlas, into a movie (via /Film).
- Watchmen viral stuff: 10 Years of Dr. Manhattan news report and The Keene Act and You PSA.
What Is Speculative Fiction?
April 11, 2008 at 12:34 pm | In Books, Genres | 5 CommentsTags: Alternate history, Cormac McCarthy, David Mitchell, Fantasy, Fiction, Horror, Jonathan Lethem, Kazuo Ishiguro, Magical realism, Michael Chabon, Michael Cunningham, Neil Gaiman, Science fiction, Speculative fiction
The kind of fiction I like to read the most, and that I tend to focus on here, falls under the broad umbrella of “speculative fiction.” I’ve never been entirely comfortable with the traditional genre labels of science fiction, fantasy and horror. The definitions that are most often applied to these genres seem so limiting, and they leave out a wide swath of really great books.
All three of these genres have one thing in common: The stories concern elements that do not exist in the so-called real world. In other words, they speculate about what might be possible but, in our everyday experience, isn’t.
In science fiction, the speculations must be grounded in the principles of science; they might not be possible now, but someday they could be, which is why science fiction is often set on future Earth or on another planet. The subjects of science fiction are space travel, dimensional travel, time travel, post-apocalyptic societies and technological innovations.
In fantasy, however, the speculations are usually based on magic and the supernatural. These speculations must follow rules, but they are not the rules of science. Generally, fantasy stories take place in imagined worlds (but not necessarily another planet) or on a fictional historical Earth.
Horror, on the other hand, most often takes place in the present day, in the world in which we live. But it introduces a fantastic or supernatural element, usually a monster of some kind. Horror also differs from fantasy in that it, by definition, should be frightening and dark.
But what about fiction that doesn’t fit neatly into one of these three categories? For instance, where would Neil Gaiman’s American Gods be classified? It is set in the modern-day world, but with its cast of mythical gods, it shades more toward fantasy than horror, although it does have horrific elements. Or what about David Mitchell’s excellent novel Cloud Atlas? This experimental novel is set in several different times, in the past, present and future, including a post-apocalyptic society. But it doesn’t read like traditional science fiction.
That’s where the label speculative fiction is useful. It covers any work of fiction that posits a “what if” question and then attempts to answer that question. That includes science fiction, fantasy and horror, plus narrower genres like alternate history and magical realism, as well as works that defy any neat label.
More contemporary writers who aren’t often associated with genre writing are stepping out of the bounds of literary fiction and into the realm of the speculative, and I’m glad because they are turning out some great works. For example, Michael Chabon’s The Yiddish Policeman’s Union is a fascinating alternate history, and one-third of Michael Cunningham’s Specimen Days is set on a future Earth, with aliens and space travel. I first started reading Jonathan Lethem via his genre-defying novels Gun, with Occasional Music, As She Climbed Across the Table and Amnesia Moon.
I like the speculative fiction label because it describes my favorite kind of writing but is much more open than the traditional genres. When I read speculative fiction, I can read hard sci-fi, traditional fantasy, contemporary horror or experimental literary fiction. The label also encourages good authors to experiment and stretch themselves without fear of being pigeonholed into an undesirable section of the bookstore. The stigma of writing about such subjects seems to have been dropped. For proof, just look at Cormac McCarthy’s Pulitzer Prize-winning (and Oprah Book Club pick) post-apocalyptic novel The Road or Kazuo Ishiguro’s foray into science fiction, Never Let Me Go, which was shortlisted for the Booker Prize and named one of Time’s 100 Best Novels of All Time.
Want to know more? Check out these sites:
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.

![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=64c5d5e8-a022-434a-b5b2-811a595db294)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=4753e774-ba65-41a5-965a-23410cf5b2f6)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=e6aecad4-618d-481f-ba69-f070942ac312)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_b.png?x-id=0384af63-1ce0-4807-a909-89ec97f2aa48)


