Some Thoughts on Book “Stickiness”
June 9, 2009 at 4:00 pm | In Books | 2 CommentsTags: Junot Díaz, Kazuo Ishiguro
I don’t like to write down my thoughts about a book or draft a review immediately after I’ve finished the book. Instead, I like to let the book sit with me for a few days, or even a few weeks. That’s because one of the most important qualities for me in deciding how much I liked the book is “stickiness.”
“Stickiness” is a fairly ineffable quality that I am sure differs from one reader to another. It has to do with how much I thought about the book after I closed it for the last time. How often I replayed certain scenes in my mind. How frequently I found myself talking about the book with others. How much my understanding of the book’s characters or themes deepened after I had finished reading it.
It often surprises me which books are “sticky” for me. Kazuo Ishiguro’s When We Were Orphans is one recent example — I can’t stop thinking about one haunting scene that occurs near the end. The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao is another; my husband and I discuss it often, and I even find myself quoting it, much to my surprise.
A “sticky” book will almost certainly receive a four- or five-star review from me and find its way into my collection. I read a lot of books that I find to be just average, which really means that they are not sticky. I might enjoy them during the actual reading of them, but once I close them, I find it difficult to recall exactly what happened or who the characters were. While such a book may have earned a better review immediately after I finished reading it, once I let it sit for a while, I think I am better able to judge whether it had any lasting impact on me. If it’s not sticky, it generally only earns three stars and a place in my BookMooch pile.
Do you find that certain books you read tend to stick with you? Does your opinion of them change over time?
Monthly Reading: May 2009
June 1, 2009 at 2:56 pm | In Books, Monthly Reading | 1 CommentTags: Crime, Dystopia, Francine Prose, Horror, Joseph Mitchell, Kazuo Ishiguro, Literary fiction, Ninni Holmqvist, Stewart O'Nan
Good month of reading, with two 4-star books! As always, click the link for my review or reading notes.
When We Were Orphans by Kazuo Ishiguro — crime
The Unit by Ninni Holmqvist — dystopian
The Night Country by Stewart O’Nan — horror
Guided Tours of Hell by Francine Prose — literary fiction
Up in the Old Hotel by Joseph Mitchell — abandoned
My rating scale:
- 1 star: Abandoned before finishing. Don’t waste your time.
- 2 stars: Poor. Avoid with extreme prejudice.
- 3 stars: Average. Read it, have a good time and move on. Or not.
- 4 stars: Great. Push it on your friends and family.
- 5 stars: Excellent. Keep it, treasure it, reread it.
Disclaimer: My ratings are very personal and may have little to do with the book’s artistic or commercial merit, or its place in the literary canon. Rather, the rating reflects how the story, characters and writing spoke to me and augmented my understanding of the world.
And here are some reviews of favorite reads from around the blogosphere:
- The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao (AzureScape)
- The Road (Book Addiction)
- Snow Flower and the Secret Fan (Bloody Hell, It’s a Book Barrage!)
- The Witches (Things Mean a Lot)
- The Years of Rice and Salt (Tor.com)
Worth Reading: When We Were Orphans
May 6, 2009 at 12:11 pm | In Books, Reviews | Leave a CommentTags: Crime, Kazuo Ishiguro, Shanghai, War
When We Were Orphans, Kazuo Ishiguro (2000)
Christopher Banks spent a happy childhood in Shanghai at the beginning of the 20th century as the son of privileged British ex patriates living in a large house supplied by the opium importer for which his father worked. He spent his days playing make-believe games with his best friend, the Japanese boy who lived next door. But then first his father, then his mother disappeared—kidnapped by ruthless Chinese criminals. An orphan, Christopher is sent to England where he grows up determined to become a famous detective like Sherlock Holmes and solve the mystery of his parents’ disappearance.
Gradually, as Christopher narrates his story – alternating between 1930s London where he lives as an adult, having fulfilled his ambition of becoming a famous detective, and his recollections of his childhood in Shanghai – the reader becomes aware that the narrator’s view of reality is skewed. Indeed, it seems that Christopher is living in a fantasy world where he believes his parents are still alive, even decades later, and that his return to Shanghai to find them will somehow avert the disastrous war brewing between the Chinese and Japanese. By the time he gets back to China, we feel like we can trust nothing that Christopher says, and that is the genius of this novel.
Christopher comes to an abrupt reckoning with the truth following a harrowing sequence in which he wends his way through a bombed-out Chinese slum, avoiding the battles going on in the streets around him while trying to locate the very house where he believes his parents are still being held. When he finally learns the truth, he returns to England defeated but still quite self-deluded.
While on the surface, When We Were Orphans is a crime novel written in the style of Arthur Conan Doyle, in actuality it is a complex psychological study of a character stranded at a traumatic point in his childhood, unable to move beyond his fantasies.
Movie Adaptation News: Never Let Me Go
December 3, 2008 at 9:10 am | In In the News, Movie Adaptations | 5 CommentsTags: Kazuo Ishiguro
Image via Wikipedia
According to /Film, one of my favorite books–Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro–is to be adapted for the big screen. This was a lovely, slowly paced book with quiet, sinister undertones. I would expect no less from the film. Mark Romanek is the director, who previously has directed only one movie that I know of: One-Hour Photo, which I liked quite a lot. So I have high hopes.
Is this an adaptation you’d like to see on the big screen?
Old Favorite: Never Let Me Go
September 15, 2008 at 10:38 am | In Books, Reviews | 3 CommentsTags: Alternate history, Dystopia, Kazuo Ishiguro, Science fiction, Speculative fiction
Image via Wikipedia
Never Let Me Go by Kazuo Ishiguro (2005)
5 stars!
My name is Kathy H. I’m thirty-one years old, and I’ve been a carer now for over eleven years.
Science fiction that reads like literature is always a rare find. Never Let Me Go is an excellent example of a novel that will satisfy both science fiction and contemporary literature fans.
The premise of this novel is simple, albeit slowly revealed as the story progresses, so I won’t spoil it. Ishiguro is playing with so many big ideas in this novel, but as I read it, I didn’t fully realize what was really being explored, because I was so caught up in the narrative of the main character’s (Kathy H.) childhood and adolescence. I only gradually came to ponder the underlying issues. Why do we accept without questioning our destinies as they have been told to us? What is it about human nature that needs the Other, something different to hate and discriminate against? At what point do we trade in our humanity?
Beyond the story, the characters are what make this novel so affecting. The voice of the narrator is so fully realized that I could literally hear her speaking in my head, down to accent and intonations, as I read. This book was so beautiful and haunting it will resonate with me for a long time.
What Is Speculative Fiction?
April 11, 2008 at 12:34 pm | In Books, Genres | 5 CommentsTags: Alternate history, Cormac McCarthy, David Mitchell, Fantasy, Fiction, Horror, Jonathan Lethem, Kazuo Ishiguro, Magical realism, Michael Chabon, Michael Cunningham, Neil Gaiman, Science fiction, Speculative fiction
The kind of fiction I like to read the most, and that I tend to focus on here, falls under the broad umbrella of “speculative fiction.” I’ve never been entirely comfortable with the traditional genre labels of science fiction, fantasy and horror. The definitions that are most often applied to these genres seem so limiting, and they leave out a wide swath of really great books.
All three of these genres have one thing in common: The stories concern elements that do not exist in the so-called real world. In other words, they speculate about what might be possible but, in our everyday experience, isn’t.
In science fiction, the speculations must be grounded in the principles of science; they might not be possible now, but someday they could be, which is why science fiction is often set on future Earth or on another planet. The subjects of science fiction are space travel, dimensional travel, time travel, post-apocalyptic societies and technological innovations.
In fantasy, however, the speculations are usually based on magic and the supernatural. These speculations must follow rules, but they are not the rules of science. Generally, fantasy stories take place in imagined worlds (but not necessarily another planet) or on a fictional historical Earth.
Horror, on the other hand, most often takes place in the present day, in the world in which we live. But it introduces a fantastic or supernatural element, usually a monster of some kind. Horror also differs from fantasy in that it, by definition, should be frightening and dark.
But what about fiction that doesn’t fit neatly into one of these three categories? For instance, where would Neil Gaiman’s American Gods be classified? It is set in the modern-day world, but with its cast of mythical gods, it shades more toward fantasy than horror, although it does have horrific elements. Or what about David Mitchell’s excellent novel Cloud Atlas? This experimental novel is set in several different times, in the past, present and future, including a post-apocalyptic society. But it doesn’t read like traditional science fiction.
That’s where the label speculative fiction is useful. It covers any work of fiction that posits a “what if” question and then attempts to answer that question. That includes science fiction, fantasy and horror, plus narrower genres like alternate history and magical realism, as well as works that defy any neat label.
More contemporary writers who aren’t often associated with genre writing are stepping out of the bounds of literary fiction and into the realm of the speculative, and I’m glad because they are turning out some great works. For example, Michael Chabon’s The Yiddish Policeman’s Union is a fascinating alternate history, and one-third of Michael Cunningham’s Specimen Days is set on a future Earth, with aliens and space travel. I first started reading Jonathan Lethem via his genre-defying novels Gun, with Occasional Music, As She Climbed Across the Table and Amnesia Moon.
I like the speculative fiction label because it describes my favorite kind of writing but is much more open than the traditional genres. When I read speculative fiction, I can read hard sci-fi, traditional fantasy, contemporary horror or experimental literary fiction. The label also encourages good authors to experiment and stretch themselves without fear of being pigeonholed into an undesirable section of the bookstore. The stigma of writing about such subjects seems to have been dropped. For proof, just look at Cormac McCarthy’s Pulitzer Prize-winning (and Oprah Book Club pick) post-apocalyptic novel The Road or Kazuo Ishiguro’s foray into science fiction, Never Let Me Go, which was shortlisted for the Booker Prize and named one of Time’s 100 Best Novels of All Time.
Want to know more? Check out these sites:
Monthly Reading: March 2007
April 1, 2007 at 7:39 am | In Monthly Reading, Reviews | Leave a CommentTags: David Allen, Japanese, Kazuo Ishiguro, Markas Zusak, Personal development, Robert M Pirsig, Umberto Eco, Young adult
Getting Things Done by David Allen — personal development
An Artist of the Floating World by Kazuo Ishiguro — Japanese fiction
The Book Thief by Markus Zusak — young adult
The Mysterious Flame of Queen Loana by Umberto Eco — abandoned
Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance by Robert Pirsig — abandoned
My rating scale:
- 1 star: Abandoned before finishing. Don’t waste your time.
- 2 stars: Poor. Avoid with extreme prejudice.
- 3 stars: Average. Read it, have a good time and move on. Or not.
- 4 stars: Great. Push it on your friends and family.
- 5 stars: Excellent. Keep it, treasure it, reread it.
Disclaimer: My ratings are very personal and may have little to do with the book’s artistic or commercial merit, or its place in the literary canon. Rather, the rating reflects how the story, characters and writing spoke to me and augmented my understanding of the world.
Related articles by Zemanta
Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.

![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=2ed0723f-7049-457d-8f9b-2d804dc9b8b1)

![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=599be9da-8262-4b71-8535-98d5cd122d32)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=c2215ddf-1b9c-46b7-a7dd-2b750f872609)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=ebe401cd-7c67-44d9-b614-f4b79512c18b)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=01a474b1-8c96-4ef3-bf1a-517ce696dd42)
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_b.png?x-id=0384af63-1ce0-4807-a909-89ec97f2aa48)

![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=ddf3c648-a700-4543-a609-e86a73a3f4e3)


