What I Read This Month: October 2009

October 31, 2009 at 2:37 pm | In Books, Monthly Reading | 2 Comments
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Cover of "The Children Of Men"

Cover of The Children Of Men

This was an excellent reading month. I started a new project to read more science fiction written by women (which I am blogging about), and that inspired me to read a lot of high-quality books.

First up, I actually bought and read a brand-new book, which is unusual for me. I finished Margaret Atwood’s excellent companion piece to Oryx and Crake, The Year of the Flood. It is set during the same dystopian/apocalyptic period as Oryx and Crake but follows two female characters who are members of a religious-environmental cult called God’s Gardeners (there are even hymns). I have to say that I enjoyed this novel even more than Oryx, although it had the same kind of abrupt, unexplained ending that led me to believe a third novel might be planned. I wrote a much lengthier review here.

Two rereads this month: The Children of Men by P.D. James and A Wrinkle in Time by Madeleine L’Engle. Both were as good as I remembered, although I was surprised to discover how much the film version of Children of Men veered away from the novel (it had been years since I read it). I was remarking to a friend that my 19-month-old son wasn’t really talking yet, and she compared him to Wrinkle’s Charles Wallace — definitely a compliment, that.

Some new books as well: The Kin of Ata Are Waiting for You by Dorothy Bryant and The House of the Scorpion by Nancy Farmer. The first was billed as sci fi, but really it is a utopian fantasy. It was still quite good, although it struck me as a little naive. The second is intended for young adults, but I found it enthralling and not nearly as simplistic as most YA books I read.

I am currently taking a departure from this month’s trend and reading Bill Bryson’s Notes from a Small Island for my book club. Since I am a bit of an Anglophile, and I love anything that gently pokes fun at the British, I am already enjoying it very much.

Roundup: 5 books read (click the titles for my full review or reading notes).

four_stars The Year of the Flood, The Children of Men, A Wrinkle in Time, The House of the Scorpion

three_stars The Kin of Ata Are Waiting for You

My rating scale:

  • 1 star: Abandoned before finishing. Don’t waste your time.
  • 2 stars: Poor. Avoid with extreme prejudice.
  • 3 stars: Average. Read it, have a good time and move on. Or not.
  • 4 stars: Great. Push it on your friends and family.
  • 5 stars: Excellent. Keep it, treasure it, reread it.

Disclaimer: My ratings are very personal and may have little to do with the book’s artistic or commercial merit, or its place in the literary canon. Rather, the rating reflects how the story, characters and writing spoke to me and augmented my understanding of the world.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

What I Read This Month: September 2009

September 30, 2009 at 12:56 pm | In Books, Monthly Reading | 2 Comments
Tags: , , , , , ,
Red Mars

Image via Wikipedia

It was not such a productive month, reading-wise. I only finished two books, both of which were meh, and I abandoned two books as well. I am excited about the book I am currently reading: Margaret Atwood’s The Year of the Flood. But that one will have to go in next month’s roundup.

The reason why I didn’t read much is that I spent so much time on Green Mars, the second in Kim Stanley Robinson’s Mars trilogy. Green Mars did not hold my attention nearly as well as Red Mars, the first book in the series. I tolerated the endless scenes of driving around on the Martian surface in Red Mars; in Green Mars, it was getting a little old. The book did get exciting during the Martian Revolution at the end, but I had to wade through like 600 pages just to get there.

I also read another one of Ursula K. Le Guin’s young adult books, Gifts. Having just finished A Wizard of Earthsea, I thought that Gifts, while well written and engaging, was a little too familiar to really grab my interest. A good book for young readers, surely, but not for jaded old me.

The books I abandoned were Nowhere Else on Earth by Josephine Humphreys and Jack Knife by Virginia Baker. The first is set during the Civil War in Lumberton, North Carolina, and is about the Lumbee Indians, but I just found it too confusing, with far too many characters, to engage me. The second is a suspense thriller time travel novel set during the Jack the Ripper years, but the jump-cut style of writing broke up the story way too much to hold me.

Roundup: 2 books read, 2 abandoned (click the titles for my full reading notes)

three_stars Green Mars, Gifts

one_star Nowhere Else on Earth, Jack Knife (abandoned)

My rating scale:

  • 1 star: Abandoned before finishing. Don’t waste your time.
  • 2 stars: Poor. Avoid with extreme prejudice.
  • 3 stars: Average. Read it, have a good time and move on. Or not.
  • 4 stars: Great. Push it on your friends and family.
  • 5 stars: Excellent. Keep it, treasure it, reread it.

Disclaimer: My ratings are very personal and may have little to do with the book’s artistic or commercial merit, or its place in the literary canon. Rather, the rating reflects how the story, characters and writing spoke to me and augmented my understanding of the world.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Monthly Reading: June 2009

July 1, 2009 at 3:21 pm | In Books, Monthly Reading | Leave a Comment
Tags: , , , ,
Cover of "Childhood's End"

Cover of Childhood's End

An good month for quality, if not quantity. Click the titles for the review.

four_starsChildhood’s End by Arthur C. Clarke — science fiction

four_starsCat’s Eye by Margaret Atwood — literary fiction

three_starsManhattan Loverboy by Arthur Nersesian — literary fiction

My rating scale:

  • 1 star: Abandoned before finishing. Don’t waste your time.
  • 2 stars: Poor. Avoid with extreme prejudice.
  • 3 stars: Average. Read it, have a good time and move on. Or not.
  • 4 stars: Great. Push it on your friends and family.
  • 5 stars: Excellent. Keep it, treasure it, reread it.

Disclaimer: My ratings are very personal and may have little to do with the book’s artistic or commercial merit, or its place in the literary canon. Rather, the rating reflects how the story, characters and writing spoke to me and augmented my understanding of the world.

Here are some other reviews of my favorite books from around the Interwebs:

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Worth Reading: Cat’s Eye

June 13, 2009 at 1:34 pm | In Books, Reviews | Leave a Comment
Tags: ,
cats eye

Image via Wikipedia

Cat’s Eye, Margaret Atwood (1988)

While I am a fan of her more speculative fiction, I’m finding that Margaret Atwood can write about almost anything and make it fascinating. This long mainstream novel is a character study of Elaine, a female artist growing up in Toronto who finds herself riding the wave of early feminism. The narrative moves back and forth from the present, when Elaine has returned to her native city for a showing, to her past, from her early childhood through her first marriage and divorce.

Clearly, the most formative time in Elaine’s life is when as a pre-adolescent girl, she was bullied mercilessly by her friends in the torturous ways that only girls can seem to devise. Ironically, she can’t even remember these events, having blocked the abuse completely, until she is going through her dying mother’s things and discovers some meaningful items from her childhood that bring the memories flooding back. I think all women can relate to what Elaine experienced, and I even found myself cheering out loud when she finally stands up to her tormentors. Still, she never quite gets over it, and that incident will shape her life and her art, even when she doesn’t remember it.

Atwood tells a wonderful coming-of-age story here, while aptly weaving in the history of the feminist movement, especially in art, and drawing parallels between the young bullies and the militant feminists Elaine will later encounter.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

2008 Year in Books

January 1, 2009 at 12:23 pm | In Year in Review | 4 Comments
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
Original Cover
Image via Wikipedia

I saw a lot of bloggers doing year-in-review posts, so I thought it would be fun to add my own to the mix. I’m not going to list every book I read; visit the Monthly Reading category to see that.

First, some favorites/surprises:

Now, the stats. I am a bit ashamed of my total number of books read, because clearly a lot of you are kicking my butt in this category, but hey! I did have a baby this year. So cut me some slack.

Total books read: 45 (averaged 3.75 books per month)

Number of books started but then abandoned: 11 (Whew, that seems like a lot of rejection!)

Ratings stats:

five_stars 3 books (5%) They were: 13 Ways of Looking at the Novel, The Little Prince and Slaughterhouse-Five

four_stars 17 books (30%)

three_stars 22 books (40%)

two_stars 3 books (5%)

one_star 11 books (20%) These were all the abandoned books.

Taking out the abandoned books, my ratings system is pretty much following the bell curve, which I guess is what you would expect.

The remaining stats don’t count the abandoned books.

Types of books read:

  • Novels: 34 (76%)
  • Novellas and short stories: 6 (13%)
  • Nonfiction: 5 (11%)

Clearly, I love novels. I could read more nonfiction, I think.

Genres read:

  • Science fiction: 12 (27%)
  • Literary fiction: 8 (18%)
  • Horror: 5 (11%)
  • Suspense thrillers: 4 (9%)
  • Historical fiction: 3 (7%)
  • Classics: 2 (4%)
  • Mystery: 2 (4%)
  • Parenting: 2 (4%)
  • Memoir: 2 (4%)
  • Children’s literature: 2 (4%) This doesn’t count all the picture books I read.
  • Fantasy: 1 (2%)
  • Literary criticism: 1 (2%)
  • Short story anthologies: 1 (2%)

Science fiction is still my favorite genre, but I have been reading a lot of mainstream fiction, to my surprise.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Banned Books Week Roundup

October 3, 2008 at 8:40 am | In Books, On the Web | 6 Comments
Tags: , , , , , , ,

I’ve really been enjoying all the posts around the book blogosphere in honor of Banned Books Week this week. So many of my personal favorites are also challenged books. That can’t be a coincidence. Great literature and bold ideas will always be challenged, because they make you think and have the power to effect change. Challengers may say it’s all about dirty words and inappropriate subjects for children, but it really is about the ideas.

I thought I would post a roundup of some reviews from other blogs of my favorite challenged books. If you have any you’d like to add, please leave them in the comments.

Here’s another roundup of Banned Books Week reviews from Age 30+…A Lifetime of Books.

I’m sure I missed a lot of great posts and reviews. But I think this response illustrates the value of Banned Books Week: It gets people reading and discussing books that have been challenged and exposes us to new books and new ideas.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Monthly Reading: July 2008

August 1, 2008 at 9:25 am | In Monthly Reading, Reviews | Leave a Comment
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Oryx and Crake by Margaret Atwood — dystopian, post-apocalyptic science fiction

Then We Came to the End by Joshua Ferris — comedy

Gentlemen of the Road by Michael Chabon — historical adventure fiction

Bad Twin by Gary Troup — Lost-related fiction

Grub by Elise Blackwell — abandoned

Miscellaneous Reading: Completed The Dark Tower: The Long Road Home (5 issues) comic book series.

My rating scale:

  • 1 star: Abandoned before finishing. Don’t waste your time.
  • 2 stars: Poor. Avoid with extreme prejudice.
  • 3 stars: Average. Read it, have a good time and move on. Or not.
  • 4 stars: Great. Push it on your friends and family.
  • 5 stars: Excellent. Keep it, treasure it, reread it.

Disclaimer: My ratings are very personal and may have little to do with the book’s artistic or commercial merit, or its place in the literary canon. Rather, the rating reflects how the story, characters and writing spoke to me and augmented my understanding of the world.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Worth Reading: Oryx and Crake

July 12, 2008 at 10:28 am | In Books, Reviews | 4 Comments
Tags: , , , , ,

Oryx and Crake, Margaret Atwood (2003)

Snowman wakes before dawn. He lies unmoving, listening to the tide coming in, wave after wave sloshing over the various barricades, wish-wash, wish-wash, the rhythm of heartbeat. He would so like to believe he is still asleep.

The premise of this novel, and the details of the future world it depicts, are so outlandish that you must either accept them immediately or stop reading. I accepted them. I was instantly subsumed in the fascinating, disturbing world that Atwood has created.

The novel opens in a post-apocalyptic shore-side wilderness where the only survivor (presumably), Snowman, is barely surviving. He sleeps in a tree and spends his days in a hallucinatory stupor. The only breaks in the monotony are visits from children who turn out to be genetically engineered post-humans, with glowing green eyes and the ability to eat leaves.

Gradually, Snowman — whose pre-apocalypse name is Jimmy — reveals the events leading up to the disaster as he remembers them. He grew up in a corporate compound separated by walls and guards from the “pleeblands,” where the poor lived in crowded, polluted slums. His father worked for a powerful company conducting research in genetic engineering to come up with new products designed to relieve food shortages, prolong life and preserve beauty, resulting in such bizarre creations as the pigoon and the rakunk. As a teenager, Snowman befriends a brilliant but anti-social young man who calls himself Crake, whose genius enables him to attend a prestigious and luxurious university and then get a high-profile job conducting top-secret eugenics research. Crake brings his old friend into the compound where he works, and there Snowman learns that Crake has engineered a new race of people who don’t have many of the “problems” we do.

Also there is Oryx, the beautiful, victimized woman who both men love. Yes, this is a grand story about the downfall of the human race, but it is also the oldest story of all: a love triangle.

This book kept me fascinated and disturbed until the very end. There were so many outlandish details, but at the heart it explores some fundamental issues: the unchecked power of people wielding science, without regard for consequences; the calamitous effects of environmental abuse; the potential within us to destroy ourselves; the follies of playing god. The only criticism I have is that the ending is a bit unsatisfying. It just leaves us hanging. But overall, Atwood is a terrific writer exploring the science fiction themes of apocalypse and dystopia, and Oryx and Crake is a terrific contribution to this genre.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Is Margaret Atwood a Science Fiction Writer?

May 22, 2008 at 9:12 am | In Authors, Books | Leave a Comment
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
The Handmaid's TaleImage via Wikipedia

I have read three novels by Margaret Atwood (and I have two more waiting on my ‘to read’ shelf), and I have found her to be a consistently satisfying writer. I wouldn’t say that I loved all of her books, but they have all kept me interested and engaged, which is saying quite a lot. Even more impressive, I think, is that Atwood is considered a mainstream writer, but she gets away with writing fiction that could be called science fiction. And she wins major awards for it! She doesn’t write only science fiction, though, but also tries her hand at other genres, such as historical fiction. Not many writers can be successful at genre-hopping, but more are trying it. Michael Chabon and Kazuo Ishiguro spring to mind.

My favorite book by Atwood has got to be The Handmaid’s Tale. I first read it when I was younger and then reread it fairly recently. This novel is unabashedly science fiction. It is set in a dystopian future, in which the U.S. government has been taken over by Christian fundamentalists and a lot of basic rights have been stripped away. Due to extreme pollution, many people have become infertile. Those women who are fertile are enslaved as Biblical-style handmaids, conceiving and bearing children for wealthy, infertile women.

Despite being science fiction, I think this novel was so successful and has been so widely read because its core message is a frightening warning about how quickly and easily the freedoms we take for granted can be stripped away. What struck me the last time I read it is the method of depriving women of their rights that was used: Their bank accounts were frozen, and electronic access to money was cut off. As we are well on our way to a cashless society, this struck me as an all-too-real danger, one we placidly accept. The feminist themes, presented in a very compelling way, also make the novel more accessible to a wider audience.

I recently finished The Blind Assassin, which won the Booker Prize and which I also enjoyed very much. The genre of this novel is not as straightforward, but it does contain science fiction elements. In fact, its structure is very unusual, in that it is a novel within a novel within a novel. The framing structure is a straightforward historical novel about a wealthy Canadian family’s fall from grace during the Depression and World War II. Within this novel is an intertwined story of two unnamed lovers and their clandestine affair. During their meetings, the lovers — one of whom is a pulp writer — tell each other a bizarre fable that takes place on an alien planet, which underscores their unspoken feelings for each other. The fable, titled The Blind Assassin, is turned into a novel by one of the characters that develops a cult-like following. The intricate structure makes this an engrossing novel, but it is questionable whether it can be called science fiction. Nevertheless, Atwood is definitely experimenting here.

Finally, Alias Grace is the Atwood novel I liked the least, even though I still enjoyed it. It is a historical novel, but also a bit of a psychological suspense thriller. It is set in 19th century Canada and tells the story of Grace Marks, imprisoned for the double murder of her employer and his housekeeper/lover. Grace does not remember the events of the actual murder, and a group of churchgoers, who believe she is innocent, have engaged a psychiatrist to find out what really happened. The real story must be pieced together from newspaper accounts, letters and the points of view of two unreliable narrators: Grace and the psychiatrist, who has become obsessed with her. The reader is never left entirely satisfied as to what actually happened. So again, Atwood is experimenting with structure and story.

Oryx and Crake is the next Atwood novel I plan to read. Again, this is a novel with science fiction elements that cannot be considered strictly science fiction.

I really enjoy it when authors break the artificial boundaries of genre established by publishing companies and bookstores. Traditional science fiction has its own formula, not one that I typically enjoy, except in the hands of a really skilled writer. But the brand of science fiction that Atwood writes — or perhaps I should call it speculative fiction – resonates much more strongly with me.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Monthly Reading: April 2008

May 1, 2008 at 11:23 am | In Monthly Reading, Reviews | Leave a Comment
Tags: , , , , , , , ,

The Blind Assassin by Margaret Atwood — historical fiction, books within books

High Fidelity by Nick Hornby — contemporary fiction

The Tao of Poop: Keeping Your Sanity (and Your Soul) While Raising a Baby by Vivian E. Glyck — nonfiction

A Deepness in the Sky by Vernor Vinge — abandoned

The Time Ships by Stephen Baxter — abandoned

My rating scale:

  • 1 star: Abandoned before finishing. Don’t waste your time.
  • 2 stars: Poor. Avoid with extreme prejudice.
  • 3 stars: Average. Read it, have a good time and move on. Or not.
  • 4 stars: Great. Push it on your friends and family.
  • 5 stars: Excellent. Keep it, treasure it, reread it.

Disclaimer: My ratings are very personal and may have little to do with the book’s artistic or commercial merit, or its place in the literary canon. Rather, the rating reflects how the story, characters and writing spoke to me and augmented my understanding of the world.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]
Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.