Old Favorite: Life of Pi

May 15, 2009 at 3:39 pm | In Books, Reviews | 3 Comments
Tags: , , , ,
Cover of "Life Of Pi: A Novel"

Cover of Life Of Pi: A Novel

Life of Pi by Yann Martel (2001)

5 stars!

I know what you want. You want a story that won’t surprise you. That will confirm what you already know. That won’t make you see higher or further or differently. You want a flat story. An immobile story. You want dry, yeastless factuality.

This is a novel that demands you see the world in a different way. The principal story, narrated to the author by an older version of the title character, is about a boy traveling across the Pacific with his family and the animals from the zoo they own and are relocating. The ship sinks, and the boy is the only survivor — along with a Bengal tiger. The two share a lifeboat for months while the boy goes to extraordinary measures to tame the tiger and keep them both alive.

The story is introduced as one that will make you believe in God, and indeed, God is ultimately what this fantasy tale of survival is all about: God and man and death in between them. The novel is vastly open to personal interpretation, which imbues it with a more significant but highly individual meaning for each reader, much like religion should be, and that’s what makes it so powerful.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Monthly Reading: January 2009

February 4, 2009 at 12:19 pm | In Books, Monthly Reading | 4 Comments
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Cover of "Watchmen"

Cover of Watchmen

Wow! What a great start to a new year of reading…

five_starsWatchmen by Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons — alternate history

four_starsThe Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao by Junot Díaz — magical realism

four_starsJust Past Sunset by Stephen King — horror

four_starsThe Graveyard Book by Neil Gaiman — fantasy

three_starsThe Third Policeman by Flann O’Brien — philosophical fiction

three_starsAn Arsonist’s Guide to Writers’ Homes in New England by Brock Clarke — literary fiction

My rating scale:

  • 1 star: Abandoned before finishing. Don’t waste your time.
  • 2 stars: Poor. Avoid with extreme prejudice.
  • 3 stars: Average. Read it, have a good time and move on. Or not.
  • 4 stars: Great. Push it on your friends and family.
  • 5 stars: Excellent. Keep it, treasure it, reread it.

Disclaimer: My ratings are very personal and may have little to do with the book’s artistic or commercial merit, or its place in the literary canon. Rather, the rating reflects how the story, characters and writing spoke to me and augmented my understanding of the world.

Here are the posts on my blog that were getting the most reads this month:

And here are reviews by other book bloggers on some favorite reads:

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Is Margaret Atwood a Science Fiction Writer?

May 22, 2008 at 9:12 am | In Authors, Books | Leave a Comment
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
The Handmaid's TaleImage via Wikipedia

I have read three novels by Margaret Atwood (and I have two more waiting on my ‘to read’ shelf), and I have found her to be a consistently satisfying writer. I wouldn’t say that I loved all of her books, but they have all kept me interested and engaged, which is saying quite a lot. Even more impressive, I think, is that Atwood is considered a mainstream writer, but she gets away with writing fiction that could be called science fiction. And she wins major awards for it! She doesn’t write only science fiction, though, but also tries her hand at other genres, such as historical fiction. Not many writers can be successful at genre-hopping, but more are trying it. Michael Chabon and Kazuo Ishiguro spring to mind.

My favorite book by Atwood has got to be The Handmaid’s Tale. I first read it when I was younger and then reread it fairly recently. This novel is unabashedly science fiction. It is set in a dystopian future, in which the U.S. government has been taken over by Christian fundamentalists and a lot of basic rights have been stripped away. Due to extreme pollution, many people have become infertile. Those women who are fertile are enslaved as Biblical-style handmaids, conceiving and bearing children for wealthy, infertile women.

Despite being science fiction, I think this novel was so successful and has been so widely read because its core message is a frightening warning about how quickly and easily the freedoms we take for granted can be stripped away. What struck me the last time I read it is the method of depriving women of their rights that was used: Their bank accounts were frozen, and electronic access to money was cut off. As we are well on our way to a cashless society, this struck me as an all-too-real danger, one we placidly accept. The feminist themes, presented in a very compelling way, also make the novel more accessible to a wider audience.

I recently finished The Blind Assassin, which won the Booker Prize and which I also enjoyed very much. The genre of this novel is not as straightforward, but it does contain science fiction elements. In fact, its structure is very unusual, in that it is a novel within a novel within a novel. The framing structure is a straightforward historical novel about a wealthy Canadian family’s fall from grace during the Depression and World War II. Within this novel is an intertwined story of two unnamed lovers and their clandestine affair. During their meetings, the lovers — one of whom is a pulp writer — tell each other a bizarre fable that takes place on an alien planet, which underscores their unspoken feelings for each other. The fable, titled The Blind Assassin, is turned into a novel by one of the characters that develops a cult-like following. The intricate structure makes this an engrossing novel, but it is questionable whether it can be called science fiction. Nevertheless, Atwood is definitely experimenting here.

Finally, Alias Grace is the Atwood novel I liked the least, even though I still enjoyed it. It is a historical novel, but also a bit of a psychological suspense thriller. It is set in 19th century Canada and tells the story of Grace Marks, imprisoned for the double murder of her employer and his housekeeper/lover. Grace does not remember the events of the actual murder, and a group of churchgoers, who believe she is innocent, have engaged a psychiatrist to find out what really happened. The real story must be pieced together from newspaper accounts, letters and the points of view of two unreliable narrators: Grace and the psychiatrist, who has become obsessed with her. The reader is never left entirely satisfied as to what actually happened. So again, Atwood is experimenting with structure and story.

Oryx and Crake is the next Atwood novel I plan to read. Again, this is a novel with science fiction elements that cannot be considered strictly science fiction.

I really enjoy it when authors break the artificial boundaries of genre established by publishing companies and bookstores. Traditional science fiction has its own formula, not one that I typically enjoy, except in the hands of a really skilled writer. But the brand of science fiction that Atwood writes — or perhaps I should call it speculative fiction – resonates much more strongly with me.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Classic Favorite: Slaughterhouse-Five

April 15, 2008 at 12:46 pm | In Books, Reviews | 2 Comments
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
Original Cover

Slaughterhouse Five, Kurt Vonnegut (1969)

Five stars!

All this happened, more or less.

It took me this long to read Vonnegut’s classic time travel novel—about Billy Pilgrim, who has become unstuck in time—and of course I now wonder why I waited. I was inspired to finally pick up this novel by the episode of Lost in which Desmond similarly becomes unstuck in time. I was surprised to find that the novel is not only an exploration of time travel but also a potent anti-war novel and even a fair piece of Zen Buddhist musing. After all, if every moment in your life happens simultaneously and no moment can be changed, living in the moment and accepting all states of life—including death—becomes the only option.

So it goes.

Plenty of people have written much better things about Slaughterhouse Five, so I won’t attempt to, but instead will point you to some good links:

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

In Remembrance of Kurt Vonnegut: Cat’s Cradle

September 24, 2007 at 8:36 am | In Authors, Reviews | Leave a Comment
Tags: , , , , , , ,

Cat’s Cradle, Kurt Vonnegut (1963)

Call me Jonah. My parents did, or nearly did. They called me John.

It’s hard to believe that I had never read a book by Kurt Vonnegut until after he died, even though I am sure that I have read plenty of books that were influenced by his writing. In honor of Vonnegut, and in order to introduce myself to his work, I read Cat’s Cradle upon learning of his death. The plot of Cat’s Cradle can’t really be summarized, but the story depicts the destruction of the world by means of a misguided invention and human folly. It was a terrific ride into the absurd, in which Vonnegut uses absurdities to expose the absurdities of the human species.

About Kurt Vonnegut:

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.