Old Favorite: Life of Pi

May 15, 2009 at 3:39 pm | In Books, Reviews | 3 Comments
Tags: , , , ,
Cover of "Life Of Pi: A Novel"

Cover of Life Of Pi: A Novel

Life of Pi by Yann Martel (2001)

5 stars!

I know what you want. You want a story that won’t surprise you. That will confirm what you already know. That won’t make you see higher or further or differently. You want a flat story. An immobile story. You want dry, yeastless factuality.

This is a novel that demands you see the world in a different way. The principal story, narrated to the author by an older version of the title character, is about a boy traveling across the Pacific with his family and the animals from the zoo they own and are relocating. The ship sinks, and the boy is the only survivor — along with a Bengal tiger. The two share a lifeboat for months while the boy goes to extraordinary measures to tame the tiger and keep them both alive.

The story is introduced as one that will make you believe in God, and indeed, God is ultimately what this fantasy tale of survival is all about: God and man and death in between them. The novel is vastly open to personal interpretation, which imbues it with a more significant but highly individual meaning for each reader, much like religion should be, and that’s what makes it so powerful.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Old Favorites: Octavia Butler’s Parables

July 26, 2008 at 3:55 pm | In Books, Reviews | 4 Comments
Tags: , , , , ,

Parable of the Sower (1993) and Parable of the Talents (2000), Octavia Butler

Five stars!

Parable of the Sower Cover

All that you touch
You Change.

All that you Change
Changes you.

The only lasting truth
Is Change.

God
Is Change.

A reread of Parable of the Sower reveals a dark vision of the near future that is eerily reminiscent of the pictures we all saw on TV following Hurricane Katrina, a frighteningly realistic portrayal of poverty and anarchy that is all too easy to imagine following on the heels of global warming’s devastation. The follow-up, Parable of the Talents, is even more grim and harrowing than its predecessor in its depiction of an America plunged into chaos. Butler deftly picks up the threads of the major issues facing us today — climate change, the widening gap between rich and poor, the privatization of education and social services — and follows them to the inevitably disastrous results if these problems aren’t addressed. Most frightening of all is the depiction of an America in the grips of Christian extremists who murder and enslave people and separate children from their parents, just because they do not hold the same beliefs.

Parable of the Talents Cover

But Butler’s story is one of hope too: of a prophet leading her people toward a better future, following a spiritual practice that makes more sense to me than most organized religions I know of, and of a goal — to sow the seeds of humanity throughout space — that I have always believed held the key to our survival as a species. God is change, indeed, but instead of fighting it or surrendering to it, just recognize it and use it to make your goals a reality. This message is contained within a work of fiction that paint a frightening picture of the future, but it rings very true to me.

Here we are–
Energy,
Mass,
Life,
Shaping life,
Mind,
Shaping Mind,
God,
Shaping God.
Consider–
We are born
Not with purpose,
But with potential.

If you’re interested in more Octavia Butler, here’s an essay she wrote about racism for NPR. (Thanks, Bill the Sci-Fi Guy.)

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Is Margaret Atwood a Science Fiction Writer?

May 22, 2008 at 9:12 am | In Authors, Books | Leave a Comment
Tags: , , , , , , , ,
The Handmaid's TaleImage via Wikipedia

I have read three novels by Margaret Atwood (and I have two more waiting on my ‘to read’ shelf), and I have found her to be a consistently satisfying writer. I wouldn’t say that I loved all of her books, but they have all kept me interested and engaged, which is saying quite a lot. Even more impressive, I think, is that Atwood is considered a mainstream writer, but she gets away with writing fiction that could be called science fiction. And she wins major awards for it! She doesn’t write only science fiction, though, but also tries her hand at other genres, such as historical fiction. Not many writers can be successful at genre-hopping, but more are trying it. Michael Chabon and Kazuo Ishiguro spring to mind.

My favorite book by Atwood has got to be The Handmaid’s Tale. I first read it when I was younger and then reread it fairly recently. This novel is unabashedly science fiction. It is set in a dystopian future, in which the U.S. government has been taken over by Christian fundamentalists and a lot of basic rights have been stripped away. Due to extreme pollution, many people have become infertile. Those women who are fertile are enslaved as Biblical-style handmaids, conceiving and bearing children for wealthy, infertile women.

Despite being science fiction, I think this novel was so successful and has been so widely read because its core message is a frightening warning about how quickly and easily the freedoms we take for granted can be stripped away. What struck me the last time I read it is the method of depriving women of their rights that was used: Their bank accounts were frozen, and electronic access to money was cut off. As we are well on our way to a cashless society, this struck me as an all-too-real danger, one we placidly accept. The feminist themes, presented in a very compelling way, also make the novel more accessible to a wider audience.

I recently finished The Blind Assassin, which won the Booker Prize and which I also enjoyed very much. The genre of this novel is not as straightforward, but it does contain science fiction elements. In fact, its structure is very unusual, in that it is a novel within a novel within a novel. The framing structure is a straightforward historical novel about a wealthy Canadian family’s fall from grace during the Depression and World War II. Within this novel is an intertwined story of two unnamed lovers and their clandestine affair. During their meetings, the lovers — one of whom is a pulp writer — tell each other a bizarre fable that takes place on an alien planet, which underscores their unspoken feelings for each other. The fable, titled The Blind Assassin, is turned into a novel by one of the characters that develops a cult-like following. The intricate structure makes this an engrossing novel, but it is questionable whether it can be called science fiction. Nevertheless, Atwood is definitely experimenting here.

Finally, Alias Grace is the Atwood novel I liked the least, even though I still enjoyed it. It is a historical novel, but also a bit of a psychological suspense thriller. It is set in 19th century Canada and tells the story of Grace Marks, imprisoned for the double murder of her employer and his housekeeper/lover. Grace does not remember the events of the actual murder, and a group of churchgoers, who believe she is innocent, have engaged a psychiatrist to find out what really happened. The real story must be pieced together from newspaper accounts, letters and the points of view of two unreliable narrators: Grace and the psychiatrist, who has become obsessed with her. The reader is never left entirely satisfied as to what actually happened. So again, Atwood is experimenting with structure and story.

Oryx and Crake is the next Atwood novel I plan to read. Again, this is a novel with science fiction elements that cannot be considered strictly science fiction.

I really enjoy it when authors break the artificial boundaries of genre established by publishing companies and bookstores. Traditional science fiction has its own formula, not one that I typically enjoy, except in the hands of a really skilled writer. But the brand of science fiction that Atwood writes — or perhaps I should call it speculative fiction – resonates much more strongly with me.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Authors Worth Reading: Neil Gaiman

April 22, 2008 at 5:08 pm | In Authors, Books | 4 Comments
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,
Neil GaimanImage via Wikipedia

I was first introduced to Neil Gaiman years ago through The Sandman comic books. I was never a big comic book reader (being a girl and all), but Sandman was different: compelling, dark, creepy, with fully developed stories and characters. They read less like comic books and more like beautifully illustrated novels; at the time, I was not familiar with the term graphic novel.

I didn’t become a fan of Gaiman, though, until he moved from the comics to writing novels. His first novel, Good Omens (1990), co-written with Terry Pratchett, became an instant favorite (5 stars!). Good Omens is a laugh-out-loud rendition of the End Times, starring a demon and an angel who are best friends, the 11-year-old Antichrist, the last witch and the four motorcyclists of the apocaplypse, among others.

My absolute favorite Gaiman novel is American Gods (2001) — five stars! It’s pretty rare that I read a novel that gels so neatly with what I think and feel about the world. This is such a novel. It’s about gods — gods who are brought to life by people’s belief in them, brought to America via the faiths of immigrants, and then grow old and waste away once those beliefs fade. These gods come from all over the world: from Norway and Eastern Europe, from Africa and India. But in America, they find themselves competing with new objects of worship — the Internet, automobiles, the media — which have themselves been transformed into gods by humans’ adoration of them. Caught in the middle, the stooge of the god Odin (called Wednesday), is a recently released convict named Shadow, a non-person who lets life and all the amazing things he sees roll right past him without affecting him, who is, in the words of his dead wife, “not really alive.” Until he hangs on Odin’s tree, and dies. This brief summary only scratches the surface of this multilevel novel. Every page is a discovery, and the gods that populate them all seem familiar, like old friends.

Honorable mentions have to go to more recent publications Anansi Boys (2005) and Fragile Things (2006). Anansi Boys picks up the themes of American Gods. While entertaining, it is not in the same league, although some of the scenes depicting the end of the earth where the gods reside are truly haunting. Unfortunately, the plot is too neat and too similar to other comic fantasy novels I’ve read. You can’t expect an epic on the order of American Gods every time, though, and this between-meal snack was good enough to tide me over.

Fragile Things is a collection of “short fictions and wonders,” including stories, poems and other short pieces, as well as a novella featuring Shadow, the main character from American Gods. For the most part, the stories are weird, creepy, fun horror and dark fantasy. Gaiman includes a lengthy introduction with notes on each piece. I found it interesting that he only wrote a story or poem when specifically commissioned to do so—none of these pieces was written on impulse.

If you can’t get enough of Neil Gaiman, he is also a prolific blogger.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Classic Favorite: Slaughterhouse-Five

April 15, 2008 at 12:46 pm | In Books, Reviews | 2 Comments
Tags: , , , , , , , , ,
Original Cover

Slaughterhouse Five, Kurt Vonnegut (1969)

Five stars!

All this happened, more or less.

It took me this long to read Vonnegut’s classic time travel novel—about Billy Pilgrim, who has become unstuck in time—and of course I now wonder why I waited. I was inspired to finally pick up this novel by the episode of Lost in which Desmond similarly becomes unstuck in time. I was surprised to find that the novel is not only an exploration of time travel but also a potent anti-war novel and even a fair piece of Zen Buddhist musing. After all, if every moment in your life happens simultaneously and no moment can be changed, living in the moment and accepting all states of life—including death—becomes the only option.

So it goes.

Plenty of people have written much better things about Slaughterhouse Five, so I won’t attempt to, but instead will point you to some good links:

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Worth Reading: Red Mars

January 27, 2008 at 4:07 pm | In Books, Reviews | 4 Comments
Tags: , , , , , , ,

RRed Mars Covered Mars, Kim Stanley Robinson (1993)

Mars was empty before we came.

Kim Stanley Robinson is not an easy author to read or to love. Some of his novels can be counted among my favorites (The Years of Rice and Salt), and others (The Gold Coast, Forty Signs of Rain) I simply hated — or couldn’t even get through to the end (Fifty Degrees Below). Even the books I loved required a lot from me: they are thick, dense and epic, layered with so much hard science and social science that they can sometimes read like textbooks rather than novels. But with Robinson’s best books, the effort is worth it. Red Mars is a good example.

Robinson’s epic about the colonization of Mars (the first book in a trilogy on the subject) covers a lot of ground. Sure, it tackles the myriad technical problems involved in colonizing such a hostile planet, including how to build a space elevator for easier transport of settlers and exploitation of Mars’s resources. But from there, Robinson takes on even more weighty themes: the clash between those coming to Mars to try to create an entirely new way of life and those back on Earth who want to retain control; cultural conflicts among the various ethnic and religious groups spreading out to Mars; the discovery of an innovative medical procedure that greatly extends the human lifespan and the implications for an over-populated Earth; all climaxing in a planetary revolution propelled by all of these issues.

This is a ponderous book with a lot of big ideas. It may be a bit overlong — sometimes it seems as if all the characters do is drive around by themselves for great distances over the barren Martian landscape — but those sections may be excused by the action of the rest of the novel. Robinson actually helps us believe that living on Mars is something we can achieve, while showing us that these advances will probably only exacerbate our very human problems.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

In Remembrance of Kurt Vonnegut: Cat’s Cradle

September 24, 2007 at 8:36 am | In Authors, Reviews | Leave a Comment
Tags: , , , , , , ,

Cat’s Cradle, Kurt Vonnegut (1963)

Call me Jonah. My parents did, or nearly did. They called me John.

It’s hard to believe that I had never read a book by Kurt Vonnegut until after he died, even though I am sure that I have read plenty of books that were influenced by his writing. In honor of Vonnegut, and in order to introduce myself to his work, I read Cat’s Cradle upon learning of his death. The plot of Cat’s Cradle can’t really be summarized, but the story depicts the destruction of the world by means of a misguided invention and human folly. It was a terrific ride into the absurd, in which Vonnegut uses absurdities to expose the absurdities of the human species.

About Kurt Vonnegut:

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.